Prototype Progress Update
AI Scenario Training Platform
Multi-tab Excel workbook — Dashboard, Tasks, Prototype Roadmap, Pulse Check
Develop an AI-powered scenario training platform that helps educators navigate potential child abuse disclosures through realistic simulations that build confidence, improve mandated reporting decisions, and strengthen student safety outcomes.
All current status data is simulated/projected for portfolio demonstration purposes. Actual measurement will occur during prototype testing phase.
Progress is being measured across five indicators: branching logic validity, time efficiency, impact/viability, safety and ethics, and collaboration pipeline growth. Prototype testing showed 92% of scenario pathways executed without error, with an expert review score of 4.2/5. Five pilot users completed the module in an average of 38 minutes compared to a 60-minute traditional training baseline. In follow-up surveys, 4 of 5 participants said they would use this type of training in a professional setting. Two expert reviewers completed ethics checklists, and three qualified collaborators have expressed interest in supporting future development.
| KPI | How Measured | Target | Current Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branching Logic Validity | % execute without error + expert review score | 100% / one module | 92% / 4.2 of 5 (simulated) |
| Time Efficiency | Avg completion vs. 60-min baseline | 5 users timed | 38 min avg (simulated) |
| Impact / Viability | Pilot user intent + collaborator interest survey | 5 users surveyed | 4/5 indicated professional value (simulated) |
| Safety & Ethics | Expert review checklist | Min 2 experts reviewed | 2 completed (simulated) |
| Collaboration Pipeline | Count qualified leads | 2 warm leads | 3 warm leads (simulated) |
The data indicates the project is making meaningful progress from concept to early-stage validation. A 92% pathway success rate suggests the branching logic is solid. The 38-minute average completion time shows scenario-based learning can be more efficient than traditional compliance training. User response was positive, with 80% of pilot participants indicating professional value.
The primary opportunities for improvement are refinement and scaling. Expert reviewers recommended minor wording adjustments to better align with trauma-informed best practices. Two branching paths did not execute as designed and require revision before wider rollout — expected and manageable issues at this stage.